EN: review: Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, red. Massimo Pigliucci i Maarten Boudry
Źódło/source:	Roczniki Filozoficzne, 63 (2015), nr 4
Strony/pages:	231-239

http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf.2015.63.4-8

Bibliografia/References:

1. Larry Laudan, „The Demise of the Demarcation Problem”, w: Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, red. Robert S. Cohen i Larry Laudan, Dordrecht–Boston–Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983, 111–127.
2. Gerald James Holton, Science and Anti-Science, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
3. Harry G. Frankfurt, On Bullshit, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
4. Daniel M. Hausman, Causal Asymmetries, Cambridge, U.K.–New York Cambridge University Press, 1998.
5. Frank Cioffi, Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience, Chicago: Open Court, 1998.
6. David Michaels, Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
7. Paul M. Churchland i Patricia Smith Churchland, On the Contrary: Critical Essays 1987-1997, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1998.
8. David B. Resnik, „A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31 (2000), 2: 249–267.

Informacja o autorze/Information about Author:

Mgr Michał Tatarczak – doktorant w Katedrze Metodologii Nauk na Wydziale Filozofii KUL; e-mail: tatarczak.michal@gmail.com

Cytowanie/Citation information:

Tatarczak, Michał (review). 2015. Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, red. Massimo Pigliucci i Maarten Boudry. Chicago–London: The University of Chi­cago Press 2013, ss. 469. "Roczniki Filozoficzne" 63, 4: 231-239, DOI: 10.18290/rf.2015.63.4-8.